Former MLA Aman Paswan, JDU Leader Heeralal Paswan Taken into Judicial Custody in 16-Year-Old Code of Conduct Violation Case. MP-MLA Court Rejects Bail Plea of Former MLA Aman Paswan and JDU Leader Heeralal Paswan
Former BJP MLA Aman Paswan and JD(U) leader Hiralal Paswan have been taken into judicial custody in a 16-year-old case related to violation of the model code of conduct. The Special Judge of the MP-MLA Court rejected their bail application. A non-bailable warrant had been issued against them due to their repeated absence. This case dates back to 2010 and concerns the posting of posters on government poles.
In a 16-year-old case related to the model code of conduct, former BJP MLA and then district councilor of Pirpanti, Aman Paswan, and JD(U) leader Hiralal Paswan have been taken into judicial custody by the Special Judge of the MP-MLA Court. The formal procedural steps to send both leaders to jail have been initiated.
Court Rejects Bail, Former BJP and JDU Leaders Taken into Judicial Custody
During the first-session hearing on Tuesday, Special Judge Dharmendra Kumar Pandey rejected the bail applications of both leaders, who had surrendered themselves, and took them into judicial custody. In a previous hearing, the special court had canceled their personal bonds and issued a non-bailable warrant against them due to their repeated absence.
The hearing of this case, filed 16 years ago at Antichak police station against them, had been pending all this while. Despite the case record containing their statements, both had been absent from the proceedings.
As a result, on December 24, 2025, the court of Special Judge Dharmendra Kumar Pandey had canceled their bail bonds and issued a non-bailable warrant. On Tuesday, both accused leaders surrendered in court and submitted an application seeking bail, which the court rejected.
It is worth noting that on September 9, 2010, the then Block Development Officer filed a case against both leaders at Antichak police station in Kahla Gaon for violating the model code of conduct. The case record stated how both leaders had violated the code by putting up campaign posters and banners on government poles and other public property.
